Liability

Medical negligence verdict reduced on appeal

A missed diagnosis case shows how verdicts can change after trial.

The questionIs a jury's verdict in a medical negligence case the amount the patient actually receives?

Illustrative example

A hospital room with two beds
Photo: Wikimedia Commons (public domain)

A Pennsylvania appeals court has reduced a medical negligence verdict for a patient whose infection went undiagnosed to $1.4 million, down from the $2.1 million a jury awarded.

The infection was missed through two clinic visits.

The case concerned permanent injury and the standard of care for follow-up testing.

Ivenmore Law presented expert testimony on the tests a reasonable clinic would have ordered at each visit.

A jury awarded $2.1 million. On appeal, the award was reduced to $1.4 million.

The reduction reflects a statutory adjustment. The original verdict figure is not what was paid.

Reported verdicts are not always the final amount, and what happened on appeal can matter as much as the jury's decision.

About this story

Submitted by the firm. Source review: confirmed against public court records. See our publication standards.