Insurance

Hail Damaged the Roof, but the Insurer Disputed Replacement. How a Kansas Owner Challenged the Decision

The firm explains how inspection findings and policy terms helped resolve disagreement over the necessary repairs.

The questionWhat can you do when an insurer offers to patch a roof you believe needs replacing?

Illustrative example

A house roof seen from above
Photo: Wikimedia Commons (CC0)

A Wichita homeowner will receive $41,500 for a full roof replacement after an appraisal panel rejected her insurer's offer to patch a few hail-damaged sections.

The insurer had offered $6,200, saying most of the roof was undamaged.

The roof's shingles were no longer made, so patching would have left a mismatched roof that the homeowner said would leak.

Rendessa Law brought in an independent roofer and engineer who documented hail strikes across every slope, and invoked the policy's appraisal clause.

The appraisal panel set the loss at $41,500, and the insurer paid.

The homeowner paid her deductible and half the appraisal costs.

Many property policies include an appraisal process for disputes over the amount of a loss, which can be faster than a lawsuit.

About this story

Submitted by the firm. Source review: supporting documents reviewed by result.law. See our publication standards.